The Almanac ([info]pseudohistorian) wrote,
@ 2009-04-30 14:48:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: nostalgic
Entry tags:timelines, trek rewatched and reconsidered

An Earthling's a Creature as Plain as Can Be
I've been getting more and more wrapped up in anticipation for Star Trek over the past few weeks, reading or watching everything I can connected to the movie (while, paradoxically, trying to keep myself from being completely spoiled)--whether that means the official clips released so far; Countdown, the official comic prequel to the film, and the also-connected comic "When Worlds Collide" in Wired magazine; or even following the really elaborate international Alternate Reality Game created for viral marketing purposes.

I've also been trying to figure out how I might rearrange the Star Trek Timelines at The History of Things That Never Were before the film comes out next week...

All this is, of course, in the knowledge that I'll probably need some sort of online blackout at the end of next week to safely avoid those spoilers.

Besides all that, I've been getting thoroughly into that old-school frame of mind by rewatching The Original Series (in production order, natch). I seriously doubt I'll make it through the whole thing in the next eight days, but I've already managed to finish off Season One, and some stuff jumped out at me this time around.

First off, despite the show's "seek out new life" mandate, many episodes deal with either completely human antagonists ("Mudd's Women," "Dagger of the Mind," "The Conscience of the King," "Court Martial," even "Space Seed"), essentially human antagonists ("The Return of the Archons," "A Taste of Armageddon"), or non-speaking phenomena ("The Naked Time," "This Side of Paradise"). There are very few episodes which feature "new civilisations" at all, and even the new species we do meet are usually represented by only one of its members ("The Man Trap," "The Squire of Gothos," "Arena," "The Devil in the Dark") for most or all of the episode in question.

I realise the real-world production reasons for all this, but it's still striking to see these patterns all at once.

It's also worth noting, given how much continuity has accumulated in the franchise over the years, that there are some things in this very first season of Star Trek which have huge implications (the First Federation, the Shore Leave Planet, even the famous Guardian of Forever), but are never so much as mentioned again in any live-action series.

In fact, most of these episodes don't even have indirect sequels in subsequent seasons/series, so it's surprising that the franchise is often accused of constantly rehashing past plot points...




(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]lampbane
2009-04-30 08:38 pm UTC (link)
When I was younger I always preferred the episodes of sci-fi shows that dealt with the somewhat familiar - something about the whole "exploring space" thing I found lonely and perhaps a bit frightening. I wonder if others ever felt that way, and that's perhaps why shows like that try to "touch base" as much as possible.

(And you've reminded me... 6 years and I still haven't updated the Transmet timeline. I'm never updating my HP timeline, BTW; too much work for something others have done much better.)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]pseudohistorian
2009-05-01 11:59 am UTC (link)
When I was younger I always preferred the episodes of sci-fi shows that dealt with the somewhat familiar - something about the whole "exploring space" thing I found lonely and perhaps a bit frightening.

So, in the Star Trek context, does that mean you had a problem with the very premise of Voyager, more so than the other series?

Are there particular sci-fi series which you felt were better/worse at sticking with the familiar as opposed to the exotic...?

(And you've reminded me... 6 years and I still haven't updated the Transmet timeline.

I thought you mentioned a while ago that you were planning to update it...

I'm never updating my HP timeline, BTW; too much work for something others have done much better.)

Fair enough, but you should at least keep it online--there are enough disappearing timelines (and resultant dead links) showing up on the site already. :(

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]lampbane
2009-05-01 06:42 pm UTC (link)
So, in the Star Trek context, does that mean you had a problem with the very premise of Voyager, more so than the other series?

Well, when I say "when I was younger" I am thinking of young-young, like kid-young and not teenager-young. I'm not at the point where I can say things like "back when I was a wee bairn" and mean high school era.

Voyager came out when I was 14/15. But I do admit I did not enjoy the isolation as much, and I HATED any episode that dealt with spacial phenomenons rather than aliens. I think I still do. It occurs to me just now I might have had the same problem with Stargate: Atlantis at first, and only really enjoyed it once they were back under the command umbrella of the SGC.

Of course, that logic means I'm going to utterly HATE Stargate: Continuum. I hope not; I'd hate to see SG experience the same decline that Star Trek did.

I thought you mentioned a while ago that you were planning to update it...

Busy. I should make that a weekend project, but not this weekend, as I am... busy.

Fair enough, but you should at least keep it online--there are enough disappearing timelines (and resultant dead links) showing up on the site already.

The page isn't dead; I just removed the link from my site (like I did with a lot of things that used to be there. They're around for those who know where to look.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…